Proud Sponsor of the Organization of Women in International Trade - Badge

Antitrust Lawyer Blog

FTC Releases Commentary on Horizintal Merger Guidelines
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 27th, the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice jointly released a “Commentary on the Horizontal Merger Guidelines” that continues the agencies' ongoing efforts to increase the transparency of their decision-making processes – in this case, with regard to federal antitrust review of “horizontal” mergers between competing firms. The analytical framework…

Continue reading ›
FTC Starts Workshop on Merger Notification and Review
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 27th, Federal Trade Commission Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras kicked off an International Competition Network workshop to discuss the implementation of the ICN’s recommended practices for merger notification and review. These standards are designed to make the process for reviewing mergers more effective and efficient for both the merging parties and the sometimes multiple…

Continue reading ›
Physician-Hospital Organization Plan Violates Antitrust Laws
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

The staff of the FTC stated on March 18 in an advisory opinion letter that the proposed plan by a physician-hospital organization that would involve collective bargaining with insurers over doctor fees likely would violate federal antitrust laws. The staff concluded that the price and other competitive restraints proposed by the network were not reasonably…

Continue reading ›
Valassis Settles Collusion CHarges
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 14th, the FTC announced that Valassis Communications, Inc., a leading producer of free-standing newspaper inserts (“FSIs”) in the United States, has settled charges that it attempted to collude with News America Marketing, its only FSI rival, to eliminate competition between the two companies. Under the consent order settling the FTC’s complaint, Valassis is…

Continue reading ›
Allergan Divests to Settle FTC Charges
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 8th, Botox marketer Allergan, Inc., and Inamed Corporation agreed to divest the rights to develop and distribute Reloxin, a potential Botox rival, in order to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that Allergan’s $3.2 billion purchase of Inamed would violate federal antitrust laws. The FTC alleges that Allergan’s purchase of the expected first serious…

Continue reading ›
AT&T to Merge with Bellsouth
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 5, AT&T announced its intention to merge with Bellsouth. While the Antitrust Division is conducting its investigation of the proposed merger, very little with regards to conditions or divestitures are expected because there is little overlap between the companies’ two networks. One area of concern is the area of wholesale dedicated access and…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Requires Fix in UnitedHealth’s Acquisition of PacifiCare
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On December 20, 2005, the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) Antitrust Division entered into a settlement agreement with UnitedHealth to resolve the DOJ’s antitrust concerns related to UnitedHealth’s acquisition of PacifiCare.  The settlement agreement covered three geographic markets:  Tucson, Arizona; Boulder, Colorado; and California. Tucson, Arizona The DOJ was concerned that UnitedHealth and PacifiCare were among…

Continue reading ›
FTC Rules That Consummated Merger Is Anticompetitive
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On January 6, 2005, the Commission ruled that Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (“CB&I”) illegally acquired Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.’s (“PDM”) Engineered Construction and Water Divisions. The FTC did not initially investigate the deal when the parties filed their Hart Scott Rodino notification forms. Eight months after the HSR waiting period expired, the FTC challenged the…

Continue reading ›
Aerial view of Washington DC cityscape from Arlington Virginia USA.

Contact Us

Fill out the form or call us at (202) 589-1834 to schedule your consultation.