Articles Posted in antitrust

FTC Remains Mindful of Minority Interests in Merger Review
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On November 3, 2017, the FTC announced that Red Ventures and Bankrate agreed to a divestiture of Bankrate’s Caring.com business unit to settle FTC charges that their $1.4 billion merger would likely harm competition in the market for third-party paid referral service for senior living facilities. According to the FTC’s complaint, Red Ventures was not…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Protects U.S. Electric Arc Furnace Mill Operators
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 27, 2017, the DOJ announced Showa Denko K.K. (“SDK”) will be required to divest SGL Carbon SE’s (“SGL”) entire U.S. graphite electrodes business in order for SDK to proceed with its proposed $264.5 million acquisition of SGL’s global graphite electrodes business. According to the DOJ’s complaint, SDK and SGL manufacture and sell large…

Continue reading ›
Does Avoiding a Second Request Mean that Your Deal Is Approved?
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

The answer is No.  The fact that your deal avoided a second request investigation does not mean that you are in the clear if your deal substantially lessens competition in a relevant antitrust market. The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) and Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) have for years emphasized that they will investigate and…

Continue reading ›
FTC Cleared Valero Deal But California State AG Successfully Challenged It
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 19, 2017, Valero Corporation (“Valero”) abandoned its acquisition of two northern California bulk petroleum terminals from Plains All American Pipeline (“Plains”) after the California state attorney general filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California against Valero’s proposed acquisition.  The lawsuit was filed on July 8, 2017, a day after the FTC…

Continue reading ›
FTC Clears Animal Hospital Deal With Divestitures
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On August 30, 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that Mars, Incorporated (“Mars”)  agreed to divest 12 specialty or off-hours emergency animal hospitals around the United States to settle FTC allegations that Mars’s $9.1 billion acquisition of pet care company VCA Inc. (“VCA”) would violate federal antitrust laws. Competition Problem The animal hospital industry…

Continue reading ›
FTC Protects Daily Fantasy Sports Customers By Challenging The Merger of DraftKings and FanDuel
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On June 19, 2017, the Trump Administration’s Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) authorized the staff to file an antitrust complaint to block the merger of DraftKings and FanDuel, the two largest daily fantasy sports (“DFS”) sites.  The state of California and the District of Columbia Attorneys General joined in the lawsuit.  The FTC’s legal challenge is…

Continue reading ›
EC Approves ChemChina’s Acquisition of Syngenta
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On April 5, 2017, the EC approved China National Chemical Corporation’s (“ChemChina”) proposed acquisition of  Syngenta AG (“Syngenta).  The approval is conditional on the divestiture of significant parts of ChemChina’s European pesticide and plant growth regulator business. Syngenta is the leading pesticide supplier worldwide. ChemChina is currently active in pesticide markets in Europe through Adama,…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Forces Divestiture to Protect Organic Milk Market
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On April 3, 2017, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that that it forced Danone to divest its Stonyfield Farms business in order for Danone to proceed with its $12.5 billion acquisition of WhiteWave. Prior to the merger, Danone did not produce or sell organic milk in the United States, however, it produced and sold…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Settles DirecTV Lawsuit Regarding Illegal Information Sharing
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 23, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that it reached a settlement that will prohibit DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC (“DirecTV”) and its parent corporation, AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”), from illegally sharing confidential, forward-looking information with competitors. On November 2, 2016, the DOJ’s Antitrust Division filed suit alleging that DirecTV was the ringleader…

Continue reading ›
Duke Jumps the HSR Gun: Gets Slapped With $600,000 Penalty
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On January 18, 2017, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division (“Antitrust Division”) announced a $600,000 civil settlement against Duke Energy for illegal “gun-jumping” violations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”). The HSR Act requires that parties to certain acquisitions notify the antitrust enforcement agencies and observe a waiting period before consummating the…

Continue reading ›
Aerial view of Washington DC cityscape from Arlington Virginia USA.

Contact Us

Fill out the form or call us at (202) 589-1834 to schedule your consultation.