Articles Posted in merger

Close Coordination Between FTC and EC on Essilor and Luxottica Antitrust Reviews
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 1, 2018, Essilor International S.A. (“Essilor”) and Luxottica Group S.p.A. (“Luxottica”) announced that the proposed combination between the two companies has been cleared by both the FTC and the EC without conditions. Critics raised concerns about the merged company’s shutting out competitors, which would leave consumers with fewer options and less freedom of…

Continue reading ›
Is the Selective Enforcement Defense Applicable To Antitrust Cases?
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On February 21, 2018, Judge Leon ruled against AT&T Inc.’s (“AT&T”) ability to discover evidence that would support its selective enforcement defense. Background On November 21, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) Antitrust Division filed a complaint in federal court block AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner Inc. (“Time Warner”). On February 16, 2018, the…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Antitrust Division Improves the Enforceability of its Consent Decrees
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On January 26, 2018, the head of the Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim delivered remarks to the NY State Bar where he discussed his views on behavioral remedies and consent decrees. He noted that the Division’s recent consent decrees reflect several provisions designed to ensure the Division can meaningfully enforce them.  Delrahim stated that the DOJ’s…

Continue reading ›
Power Buyer Defense Not Enough: FTC Wins PI Hearing Against Sanford Health
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On December 15, 2017, a federal district court granted the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and North Dakota Attorney General’s request for a preliminary injunction against Sanford Health’s proposed acquisition of Mid Dakota Clinic, a large multispecialty group, pending the FTC’s administrative trial on the merits scheduled for January of 2018.  FTC v. Sanford Health, et…

Continue reading ›
Senator Warren Criticizes Current State of Antitrust Enforcement
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On December 6, 2017, Senator Elizabeth Warren sharply criticized the state of antitrust enforcement in a speech at the Open Markets Institute. She said that antitrust enforcers adopted the Chicago School principles, which narrowed the scope of the antitrust laws and allowed mega-mergers to proceed resulting in many concentrated industries.  She believes that antitrust enforcers…

Continue reading ›
Trump’s FTC Challenges Tronox’s Acquisition of Cristal
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On December 5, 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued an administrative complaint challenging Tronox Limited’s proposed acquisition of Cristal, a merger of two of the top three suppliers of chloride process titanium dioxide (“TiO2”) in the North American market. Background On February 21, 2017, Tronox inked a deal to buy Cristal for $1.67 billion…

Continue reading ›
Cutting Out the Regulatory Middle-Man: AT&T Responds to DOJ’s Complaint
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On November 21, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed a lawsuit to block AT&T Inc.’s acquisition of Time Warner Inc. The vertical merger, which combines AT&T’s video distribution platform with Time Warner’s programming, could be the first such deal litigated in almost 40 years. According to the DOJ, the proposed acquisition will result…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Protects U.S. Electric Arc Furnace Mill Operators
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 27, 2017, the DOJ announced Showa Denko K.K. (“SDK”) will be required to divest SGL Carbon SE’s (“SGL”) entire U.S. graphite electrodes business in order for SDK to proceed with its proposed $264.5 million acquisition of SGL’s global graphite electrodes business. According to the DOJ’s complaint, SDK and SGL manufacture and sell large…

Continue reading ›
Does Avoiding a Second Request Mean that Your Deal Is Approved?
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

The answer is No.  The fact that your deal avoided a second request investigation does not mean that you are in the clear if your deal substantially lessens competition in a relevant antitrust market. The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) and Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) have for years emphasized that they will investigate and…

Continue reading ›
FTC Cleared Valero Deal But California State AG Successfully Challenged It
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 19, 2017, Valero Corporation (“Valero”) abandoned its acquisition of two northern California bulk petroleum terminals from Plains All American Pipeline (“Plains”) after the California state attorney general filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California against Valero’s proposed acquisition.  The lawsuit was filed on July 8, 2017, a day after the FTC…

Continue reading ›
Aerial view of Washington DC cityscape from Arlington Virginia USA.

Contact Us

Fill out the form or call us at (202) 589-1834 to schedule your consultation.